(no subject)
I would like to propose the Qai theory of testing. It is as follows
There is a proportional and inverse relationship between how much you have studied and/or how well you know the material, and how well you do on the test.
I did not know this stuff, and although I sat down with the best of intentions, I did very little actual studying. Somehow, though, I finished the test, checked my answers, fluffed up my explanations, rechecked my answers, modified my spelling, and still walked out of there ten minutes early.
Of course, I haven't gotten my test back yet, but hey, I feel good.
In other news, I (prepare to tremble) have bent HTML to my will. Watch this space for important updates (along the lines of "A WHAT tag? Huh?").
There is a proportional and inverse relationship between how much you have studied and/or how well you know the material, and how well you do on the test.
I did not know this stuff, and although I sat down with the best of intentions, I did very little actual studying. Somehow, though, I finished the test, checked my answers, fluffed up my explanations, rechecked my answers, modified my spelling, and still walked out of there ten minutes early.
Of course, I haven't gotten my test back yet, but hey, I feel good.
In other news, I (prepare to tremble) have bent HTML to my will. Watch this space for important updates (along the lines of "A WHAT tag? Huh?").